Have you ever seen results like these?
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Profit % of Budget 105% 105% 100% 54%
Consultancies can move profits between accounting periods based on earned income judgements. They run the very real risk of becoming Fat, Dumb and Happy if they squirrel too much of their profits away for a rainy day.
How does this happen?
Let's run through a 4-year period using Ashbourne Advisory as the ‘Fat, Dumb & Happy’ Consultant
In Year 1, we had a great year and decided that we only wanted to declare part of it – 105% of our target (which is where our bonuses maxed out). We kept the rest for a rainy day sitting in fat contingency pools in our biggest projects. So far all good.
Year 1
Actual Available Profit 140
Budget Profit 100
Declared Profit 105
Surplus Profit in Projects 35
Cumulative Surplus 35
Profit Percentage of Budget 105%
In Year 2, based on last year’s good performance our budgets have increased. There is enough available profit in the market to meet budget and we pull some extra profit out of the project contingencies so we hit stretch. We look like heros for the second Year in a row.
Year 1 Year 2
Actual Available Profit 140 110
Budget Profit 100 110
Declared Profit 105 115
Surplus Profit in Projects 35 -5
Cumulative Surplus 35 30
Profit Percentage of Budget 105% 105%
In Year Three we get a bigger profit target. However, the market has continued to deteriorate and the profits we make are insufficient to hit the budget. Not to be deterred (heros are brave), we reach deep into our project contingencies and draw out enough profit to hit our budgets.
We have not needed to make fundamental changes to our business – at this point we are:
- Fat with the previously earned Profits,
- Dumb in the belief we are successfully managing the business without underlying changes, and
- Happy because we have found a ‘clever’ to stay heros (and get our bonuses)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Actual Available Profit 140 110 90
Budget Profit 100 110 120
Declared Profit 105 115 120
Surplus Profit in Projects 35 -5 -30
Cumulative Surplus 35 30 0
Profit % of Budget: 105% 105% 100%
In Year Four, our failure to act has come home to roost. We have a sharp and unavoidable drop to profit. We are asking ourselves how can the market have turned so quickly?
“Governments stopped spending ahead of the election”,
“ COVID”,
“woke corporate policy has distracted the business” – just some of the bad management excuses.
What we failed to spot, which should have been apparent in Year 2, is that the market had deteriorated. If we had seen this in Year 2, we had enough time to adapt to new markets, pivot the workforce and arrest the trend.
The only management action likely in Year Four is mass redundancies to meet the work in hand. We were Fat, Dumb & Happy (and should be looking for new jobs)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Actual Available Profit 140 110 90 70
Budget Profit 100 110 120 130
Declared Profit 105 115 120 70
Surplus Profit in Projects 35 -5 -30 0
Cumulative Surplus 35 30 0 0
Profit % of Budget 105% 105% 100% 54%
It is essential to always recognise the underlying performance – I like to use the ‘3 levers model’ (explained in the next article). Be especially obsessive on overheads and utilisation – these levers you control.
Report transparently to your teams (up and down) on what is driving profit and is profits are different from underlying performance. It is often better to take the loss as they arise to force change in the business. Create the crisis or burning platform to create the change – see also the Article on “Never wasting a good crisis”.
Ask any senior Manager whether they have seen this happen – you may be surprised how often it happens. You may get a response like “We were definitely Fat, Dumb and Happy” in 2014.
Stephen Uhr
February 2024
Authors Note: I was made aware of the FDH phenonium by Ivor Catto – credit for the concept comes from him (or whoever taught it to him)